YouTube Video - click post to watch
Boone Pickens unveils a national energy plan designed to cut US dependence on foreign oil. NaturalGasInvesting.org
YouTube Video - click post to watch
Boone Pickens unveils a national energy plan designed to cut US dependence on foreign oil. NaturalGasInvesting.org
Bad Behavior has blocked 204 access attempts in the last 7 days.
July 12th, 2010 at 6:16 pm
One nuclear energy proponent said about Hydrogen/Oxygen HHO SOLAR, “You can’t kill enemies with a squirt gun. It took war motivation to deveolpe gas oil nukes. . . fasc dscn
July 12th, 2010 at 6:50 pm
A great man of the free world working to save America and Americans! Wonderful thing.
July 12th, 2010 at 7:01 pm
Nice try. Keep it up check out esteembpo + com for social media marketing. jhbgb
July 12th, 2010 at 7:59 pm
301 Moved
301 Moved
The document has moved
here.
July 12th, 2010 at 8:00 pm
The U. S. is importing 70% of the oil required to run its economy. Switching to natural gas for transportation wouldn’t solve anything since the U. S. is NOT self-sufficient when it comes to natural gas. This means that a big part of his plan would be to switch from importing a lot of oil to importing a lot of natural gas. . . (?) If I got this wrong, please let me know what I am missing.
July 12th, 2010 at 8:54 pm
L' nuclear energy not rinnovabile è not even. Moreover, if we were indeed seriously eliminating the dependency from foreign sources of energy, then we must give un' glance gives near also to the power nuclear. Today we import 84% of ours uranio from countries like the Kazakistan, Australia and Canada. The majority of coming the è rest from the downblending of uranio highly enriched from nuclear crews. The majority of the persons does not know that l' uranio peak accadrà enough soon also
July 12th, 2010 at 9:42 pm
I’m all about reducing foreign oil consumption! In fact, why stop there, let’s keep working to toatally eliminate the requirements of oil as an energy source. . period!. . . And all others forms of energy that are not renewable.
Get involved at: joeusa(dot)yuku(dot)com
-Joe
July 12th, 2010 at 10:24 pm
301 Moved
301 Moved
The document has moved
here.
July 12th, 2010 at 10:45 pm
wrong , First Solar, stock synbol FSLR has gone thru the roof because its making a profit world wide without government subsidies.
Hemp could replace a large portion, NaturalGas is already working,,, KEEP LOOKING AND JOIN PICKENSPLANdotCOM
July 12th, 2010 at 10:48 pm
Jimbol51, I agree. The big oil companies and the nuclear industry is being heavily subsidized by the Federal government. And, yes, the lobbyists make sure they keep those incentives. But in order to push for energy independence, we need more renewables. Many renewables lost their subsidies or never had them such as damless hydro, geothermal, solar-thermal, solar, and wind.
July 12th, 2010 at 11:43 pm
Government subsidized our dependence on fossil fuels, so it only makes logical sense that they must wean us off that dependence by subsidizing the new alternative energy technologies. The problem is the government needs to wean itself off the financial incentives these old energy industries keep enticing them with-some of the old energy lobbyists still have alot of cash on hand (think record oil profits).
July 13th, 2010 at 12:27 am
I think that unfortunately wind, solar-thermal, PV, geothermal, all need to be federally subsidized like Coal, Oil and Nuclear Power companies are federally subsidized.
July 13th, 2010 at 12:41 am
I think that unfortunately wind, solar-thermal, PV, geothermal, all need to be federally subsidized like Coal, Oil and Nuclear Power companies are federal he other to go faster.
July 13th, 2010 at 1:22 am
Great points. I’m all for the electric car. Clean wind power and PV’s need to be federally subsidized. When is that going to happen, though? I would LOVE it to happen, but isn’t the reality that by the time it finally happens it will be too late? From everything that I’ve studied and the research that is out there, it’s already too late. Now we just have to make it as good as we can and suffer through as best we can. Not to be pragmatic. Just depressed by this ostrich-like world.
July 13th, 2010 at 1:58 am
Then it would have absolutely to be against l' nuclear energy = destruction ambientale1) the toxic and highly radioactive refusals in turn for hundred of thousands of anni2) Mining Рcontamination of waters basements, acids, gas radon3) Dirty extraction river basins of settling, waters basements contamination, gas radon4) Grinding and refining, dissolvents, acids, gas radon5) Enrichment РCFC6) the reprocessing (or recycling) ̬ much sporco = toxic acids, heavy metals, radioactive mud
July 13th, 2010 at 2:18 am
(Con' t)
Investire in the net electrical worker nazionaleCi is a pair of fields in which the market not eseguirà the tactics alone: companies 2) Power have a bag of CapEx invested in their systems. How they make is arrested in order to free the gas natural for the cars? 
Who pagherà for the infrastructural investments for the construction-up to the net electrical worker? The electric motors efficient are much Perché not to push the development of car electrical workers and the technology of the battery (car electrical workers are not limited from Carnot’s cycle)
July 13th, 2010 at 2:35 am
Boone’s strategy is clear – substitute foreign oil consumption with natural gas. Substitute natural gap power plants with wind farms.
Some tactics that fall out of this:
1)Build lots of wind farms
2)Get power companies to close old gas-powered electric plants to free-up NG for cars
3)Get power companies to use gas for load-following rather than base load
4)Sell bi-fuel cars CNG and gasoline
5)Convert cars to run off of CNG and gas
6)Sell CNG at gas stations
7)Sell home compressors for NG
July 13th, 2010 at 3:26 am
the only way people are going to accept this plan is if this is some economic benefit. clean energy is a welcome post-product of this plan.
July 13th, 2010 at 4:01 am
mesa trust sells as a regular stock. .
July 13th, 2010 at 4:27 am
I agree with this great visionary; however, one gets the feeling that his driving force is strictly the monetary health of the economy at hand. An economy that is driven by special interest contracts that have been forged with these nations that are bilking us out of our money. Drill oil on the continental shelf? Energy production that produces some materials so dangerous that that they will require constant vigilance by future generations? Clean power yes, environemental destruction, NO.
July 13th, 2010 at 5:06 am
301 Moved
301 Moved
The document has moved
here.
July 13th, 2010 at 5:16 am
Love for this. Così, when we begin? first è better è!
July 13th, 2010 at 5:34 am
t boone pickens= trailblazer. I wish I could invest in his company, but minimum investment is 5 million bucks!
July 13th, 2010 at 6:21 am
The guy is such a visionary. Just this past week in the Dallas Morning News was an article about Houston utilities trying to limit transmission. The Houston utilities want all the new clean wind electricity from West Texas to go to Dallas or San Antonio. Bring it on with the clean electricity. All the old nasty stuff is going to be turned off around Dallas eventually. The 10,000 megawatts of new power he mentions are coming. How many dirty plants will have to turn off around Dallas? Clean ahhh.